PDA

View Full Version : Half of Australia's military headed to gulf!!


Mawwle
03-17-2003, 10:48 PM
CANBERRA, Australia — Prime Minister John Howard said Tuesday his government would commit 2,000 military personnel to any U.S.-led strike aimed at disarming Iraq.


Heh, couldnt resist :)


Seriously though, as this thing finally gets underway (about 12 years too late IMO)keep your eyes peeled. I know the FBI is probably watching every Arab in the country atm, but ya never know what they may try.


Good luck to ya all, Especially you Yaarii

Mawwle

bling
03-18-2003, 12:48 AM
lol I was thinking the same thing. So I take it you signed up already Yaari and we'll be seeing you securing our oil fields right? :)

Vallidus
03-18-2003, 01:17 AM
lol 2000 people, they have that many in their military?

yaarii
03-18-2003, 04:07 AM
We have at least 10,000 ground troops, a good part of which are on peacekeeping missions. Overall we have somewhere in the region of 60,000 military personnel. The only people we are sending to the gulf are our SAS troops (who are the second best elite troops in the world behind the british SAS) and a squadron of FA/18 fighter-bombers.

Interestingly enough, most polls here indicate 70%+ people here oppose war without UN intervention, so trust conservatives (ie our federal govt.) to serve their own interests rather than the peoples, afterall thats pretty much the definition of a conservative.

And why good luck to me? I'm about as far away from anywhere important as possible. Be worried about yourself Mawwle, remember you are target number 1 :)

DArkfrost187
03-18-2003, 05:57 AM
The Australian army fights in Khaki shirts and shorts,and sports mullets i hear....

Stoffer
03-18-2003, 06:07 AM
Mullets, lol sid.

Mawwle
03-18-2003, 07:05 AM
60,000 eh? damn, Turner FIeld here in atlanta holds 75,000 :)

Australia's entire military could come to a Braves game and still have plenty of seats left over heh.


Mawwle

Redrum_HIV
03-18-2003, 08:52 AM
lol sid u crack me up

Swishahouse
03-18-2003, 09:32 AM
Your most elite of the elite would fail against my warhead, period.

yaarii
03-18-2003, 03:41 PM
Mawwle, your entire military wouldn't fit in my city, and your military is about 50 times larger than our military. We have more civilian gun owners than you have military personnel. And we aren't the ones who spend $US400b on "defence" every year.

Wow, comparisons are fun.

Illusive
03-18-2003, 05:32 PM
Comparisons are indeed fun.

We have roughly 80 million civilian gun owners in our country, whereas your entire population is roughly 20 million :P

Pyrosprial
03-18-2003, 10:22 PM
http://www.fohguild.org/forums/attachment.php?postid=85583

Pookrt
03-18-2003, 10:44 PM
Aussies have a elite military? Second you say? I think Isreal has the most elite troops if I am correct. The Jews don't play. After Hitler giving them the shaft they don't take shit off of anyone. They finally quit assassinating people. British does have a elite team though. Watched something on them on History channel or something, 8 of them killed 200. Sounds like AD vs DB.

yaarii
03-18-2003, 10:53 PM
Israel has one of the best intelligence services in the world - Mossad. Great during peacetime for gathering intelligence, assassinating people, sabotaging things, planting disinformation etc etc - but when war breaks out they go backstage and the military comes out to play.

I was talking about elite troops - actual combat troops. Our intelligence services are not very good, ASIO (Australian Secret Intelligence Organisation) was caught spying on Belgium a while ago. Pathetic, I mean, shouldn't they have at least been spying on someone who was possibly our enemy? And getting caught - thats fucking sad considering nobody actually knows how much money we pay them to NOT get caught.

Pookrt
03-18-2003, 11:04 PM
Can anyone remind me of the name of the German troops the English employed to help them in the American Rev.? The name slipped my mind and is driving me crazy.

yaarii
03-18-2003, 11:07 PM
Try Google (http://www.google.com) .

Vega
03-19-2003, 01:14 AM
Omg more stuff!

""The only people we are sending to the gulf are our SAS troops (who are the second best elite troops in the world behind the british SAS) and a squadron of FA/18 fighter-bombers.""

I wonder which kid at school told you this one. American Delta Force wrote the book on elite special forces. Ohh and those FA/18 bombers are made by who?

""Mawwle, your entire military wouldn't fit in my city, and your military is about 50 times larger than our military""

So your comparing a sports stadium to an entire city. I think you lost yourself on this one?

"We have more civilian gun owners than you have military personnel. And we aren't the ones who spend $US400b on "defence" every year.""

Now your comparing civilian gun owners to actual military personel? Can we say apples and oranges anyone? Do you even have a clue on how many civilian gun owners there are in the US? Get a clue. On top of that, what does the US spending 400 billion dollars on defense have to do with your previous statement? Ohh wait this is you comparing things I forgot. The United States being able to collapse the only other worlds super power in history and be able to fight and win two large theatre wars at once pitted against Australias civilian gun population here.

yaarii
03-19-2003, 07:07 AM
I wonder which kid at school told you this one. American Delta Force wrote the book on elite special forces. Ohh and those FA/18 bombers are made by who?

Everyone knows the british have the best elite forces, and we model ours after theirs (our military has traditionally been based on the UK's). I'm not saying the american ones are crap, they just aren't as good. But now I'm offending your "america is always best" complex, so you have to reply saying america is better! I mean jesus man, I can admit when Australia fucks up, I can admit our economic, population and defence deficiencies - but you can't do that to america because you don't reason, you just spout pro-american crap regardless of how true or not it is.

Btw I didn't say the FA/18's were crap, they are decent fighter-bombers. My point was that they are OURS and we are sending them to fight YOUR war. Get it?

Rest of post ignored as you took the whole comparison thing out of context, I was just playing numbers, don't get yourself all hooked up on it.

Genaside
03-19-2003, 01:56 PM
Special forces are good because of training, equipment, and intelligence......the latter 2 of which australia is nowhere near second in. Therefore their special forces aren't 2nd :(

Gink
03-19-2003, 03:08 PM
The aussies have as good equipment as any other forces out there, but the intelligence is most likely lacking.... I mean, Belgium?!?! Who the hell spies on Belgium?!?!


But, Delta Force didn't write the book on special forces, if anyone did, it was the rangers. They've been around since revolutionary times, correct?




LOL, Canada's special forces consist of about 17 eskimo's and a Husky with a gimped leg, outfitted with WWII surplus Lee Enfields. Under the title the "Canadian Rangers".



Actually we used to have JTF2, but I think they're gone now :(

Vallidus
03-19-2003, 04:30 PM
Dont forget the Mounties Gink :)

Rykker
03-19-2003, 05:08 PM
Do not have the 2nd best intelligence nor combat squads.You think because you never hear of your SAS group getting caught spying they can claim they are good.But really you dont hear anything because they dont do anything.Appreciate the 2000 troops tho,i dont care if u sent 50 its the thought that counts.More sack than the French =p

Rykker
03-19-2003, 05:11 PM
They have a pretty good idea how many civilian gun owners since our weapons are registered.Now im sure the illegal gun owners in the US is prolly jusy as high as registered gun owners so you imagine how many guns are actually on the streets here.

Urocyon
03-21-2003, 05:59 PM
If I recall, they were called Hessians, Pookrt.

Thank you Looney Tunes=). Hessian Oppression where Bugs and Yosemite Sam are doing the Revolution thing hehe

Urocyon